The First Language Built for AI Agents

Magpie eliminates ambiguity so LLMs can write perfect code on the first try. Native speed, instant feedback, zero guesswork.

CA: 0x07d8e2810040A5d175c7beD4C84296406dD30B07

magpie-guide ~ bash
magpie> Hello! I'm the Magpie guide. Ask me anything about the language.

Install Magpie

Get the CLI running on your machine in seconds.

Terminal
git clone https://github.com/magpie-lang/magpie.git
cd magpie
cargo build -p magpie_cli
Copied to clipboard!

Why Magpie?

Most languages are optimized for human typing. Magpie is optimized for AI generation.

🔍

Zero Ambiguity

Every operation is self-documenting. AI never has to guess what a `+` sign means or infer hidden types. If it writes it, it's intentional.

🧩

Fewer Choices, Less Errors

There is exactly one way to do things. Fewer syntactic choices means fewer decision points, leading to dramatically fewer errors from AI agents.

⚡️

Ultra-Fast Feedback

The compiler runs in milliseconds, giving AI agents immediate structural and type-checking feedback after every generation.

The Numbers Speak for Themselves

Comparing Magpie with Rust and TypeScript on the same program.

Compile Time

Winner

Milliseconds to compile. Faster means a tighter AI feedback loop.

Magpie
155ms
Rust
234ms
TypeScript
268ms

Execution Speed

Winner

Time to run the compiled program natively.

Magpie
32ms
Rust
32ms
TypeScript
131ms

Peak Memory

Runner-up

Maximum memory footprint during execution.

Rust
1.4 MB
Magpie
1.6 MB
TypeScript
69.2 MB

Vocabulary Complexity

Winner

Lower ratio means higher predictability for LLMs.

Magpie
0.107
Rust
0.225
TypeScript
0.231
View Full Benchmarks

Zero Hidden Semantics

Why LLMs write Magpie better than they write Rust or TypeScript.

Conventional (Rust/TypeScript) Implicit & Ambiguous
// Is this addition or string concat?
// Does it overflow? Panic? Coerce types?
let sum = a + b;

// Implicit branches across multiple forms
if cond { return x; }
match cond { true => x, false => y }

// Implicit memory management
// Invisible lifetime rules or opaque GC cycles
let b = &name;
let s = Arc::new(value);
Magpie Explicit & Predictable
; Explicit types, named operands, explicit overflow rules
%sum: i64 = i.add { lhs=%a, rhs=%b }


; Exactly one way to branch (cbr/br)
cbr %cond bb_true bb_false


; Ownership transitions are explicit operations
%b: borrow Str = borrow.shared { v=%name }
%s: shared T   = share { v=%value }

Fewer choices = fewer LLM decision points = fewer errors. Magpie uses ~2.3× more tokens per operation, but eliminates the hidden rules that cause AI retries and borrow checker failures.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Magpie and its LLM-first design.

Is Magpie interpreted or compiled?

Magpie compiles to native machine code via LLVM, just like Rust or C++. It provides the execution speed of a systems language with a sub-200ms compilation cycle.

Do I need to learn a new syntax?

Magpie uses a highly structured, explicit SSA (Static Single Assignment) syntax. While unconventional for humans, it is dramatically easier for AI agents to write without errors.

How does it handle memory management?

Magpie uses a mix of ARC (Automatic Reference Counting) for deterministic heap management and Rust-like explicit ownership rules (borrow, mutborrow, share) to guarantee safety without a garbage collector.

Why not just use Python or TypeScript?

Dynamic languages have hidden semantics and ambiguous patterns that cause LLMs to make subtle mistakes. Magpie forces the AI to be explicit, resulting in higher first-try success rates for complex code generation.